It’s already become the most expensive ballot fight in California history, with $424 million spent on sports betting measures.
source
It’s already become the most expensive ballot fight in California history, with $424 million spent on sports betting measures.
source
they probs not even gon help tribes
nobody wants to go to a casino to place a bet when they can do it from the comfort of their homes.
Idgaf bout no natives .. yes on 27 I'm tryna bet on the super bowl and world cup
Wow. Is it 18+ or 21+ only
tribes dont put on food on my table
September 23 if pass we star betting on sports 2023
Gambling is worse than burning money. It is just a method of removing money from the real economy and into private accounts with no useful services or goods ever provided.
Vote NO on BOTH!
Greedy tribes have enjoyed a tax free monopoly for too long. Many native casinos are no longer owned by tribal members. People should be able to do whatever they want with their money.
JUST SAY NO TO BOTH
So people can steal but can’t gamble?
Probably tamer than the stock market.
Pass or not, gamblers will keep gambling.
Offshore betting has been around for a while now.
Finally, I don’t have to drive to those far away casinos.
If everyone goes broke due to this new addiction crime rates will go up
Casinos want our sympathy.
people can do whatever they want with their money but I’m voting no on both because I don’t think the proposed options are the best ways to regulate sports betting and because the ads are predatory and misleading. I’m okay with gambling, I just don’t like the current options.
Can anybody explain why the legislature can't vote on legalizing gambling? Why does this have to go through props?
The social and personal cost of gambling is too high to make it even more widespread. This is just businesses trying to fleece the public.